Forest Digest: June 24, 2018

June 24th, 2018|Tags: , , |0 Comments

.fusion-fullwidth-1 {
padding-left: px !important;
padding-right: px !important;
}

Check out what’s happened this past week in forestry news!

‘The entire habitat is gone’: Hawaii’s natural wonders claimed by lavaThe Guardian

After recent lava flows, a large portion of Hawaii’s native Ohia forest has been buried under lava. The area was home to many native Hawaiian species.

Loss of Earth’s intact forests speeds up: scientistsPhys.org

Scientists are alarmed about the increasing deforestation of intact forests across the globe. Since 2000, the average amount of daily forest loss was 200 sq. km.

Hotter Cities Could Be Deadly for Americans Without ShelterCities Lab

With homelessness across the United States on the rise, consequences of climate change could prove deadly to those without shelter.

Climate Change First Became News 30 Years Ago. Why Haven’t We Fixed It?National Geographic Magazine

In 1956, the New York Times was already discussing the effect greenhouse gas emissions would have on our environment. In 1988, drought, heat and fire were all hot topics in the news. So now, in 2018, why are we still not all-in on the fight against climate change?

The post Forest Digest: June 24, 2018 appeared first on American Forests.

Look Out for These Hiking Hazards

June 22nd, 2018|Tags: |0 Comments

.fusion-fullwidth-1 {
padding-left: px !important;
padding-right: px !important;
}

By Leah Rambadt, American Forests

When you’re hiking, careless contact with plants and poor wardrobe choices can result in uncomfortable rashes from plants or insect bites. Here are some plants and insects you should watch for while on the trail or following your excursion, and first aid treatment you should follow if you make contact with them.

Plants

Poison Ivy

Range: All U.S. states east of the Rocky Mountains

poison ivy

You can find poison ivy in wooded areas, especially along tree-line breaks and in open fields. Credit: Bill Harms

Poison ivy leaves range from light green to a reddish color, depending on the season. It looks like a small, herbaceous plant when young, a small tree or a carpet of vines after a few years, and a massive, hairy vine after a decade of growth.

Poison Oak

Range: Western North America

Poison Oak

Poison oak is found in conifer and mixed broadleaf forests, woodlands and grasslands. Credit: Steve/Flickr

This plant has lobed, oak-like leaves that grow in groups of three and range from green to bright red, depending on the season.

Poison Sumac

Range: Eastern U.S. and Canada

Poison Sumac

Poison sumac grows exclusively in swamps, bogs and wetlands. Credit: Will Stuart

Poison sumac grows into a small tree. Contact with this plant results in a reaction similar to poison ivy and poison oak.

poison ivy rash

Poison ivy, poison oak and poison sumac produce urushiol on their leaves or branches. This oily, allergenic substance irritates the skin upon contact, and will cause your skin to blister and become red and itchy. Credit: KrisnFred/Flickr

Manchineel

Range: Parts of Florida and the Caribbean

Manchineel is a flowering tree that has shiny, green leaves with spikes of small, greenish flowers. Its numerous small fruits, or “pomes,” are green or greenish-yellow when ripe, though they’re often tinged red and look similar to an apple.

The entire tree is toxic. A quick brush against its bark or standing near it can result in burning blisters. Ingesting any part of this tree or its fruit can be lethal.

Stinging Nettle

Range: Throughout the U.S. and Canada

Stinging Nettle

Stingle nettle is found in moist sites along streams, open forests, ditches and woodland clearings. Credit: svklimkin/Flickr

Stinging nettle is covered with tiny, hollow hairs called trichomes that act like hypodermic needles by injecting irritants into your skin upon contact. The resulting itching sensation lasts from a few hours to a day.

Giant Hogweed

Range: New England, the Mid-Atlantic, and northwestern U.S.

Description: This wildflower can grow over 14 feet tall. It has hollow, ridged stems with dark reddish-purple blotches, large compound leaves and white flower heads. Its sap is light-sensitive – skin contact followed by sunlight exposure causes severe skin and eye irritation, painful blistering, permanent scarring and blindness.

First Aid Treatment:

  1. Immediately wash affected area with warm soap and water.
  2. Remove contaminated clothing – Plant oil can continue to spread from clothing and shoes.
  3. To ease itching and discomfort, apply cool compresses for 15 to 30 minutes at a time. Avoid topical antihistamines, anesthetics and antibiotics, which may make the skin more sensitive. Use calamine lotion or baking soda to neutralize the effects of the plants’ chemicals.

Additional step for giant hogweed – Stay out of sunlight for a few days.

Insects

General Prevention Tips:

  • Research the area you’ll be hiking, and avoid peak insect times.
  • Avoid wearing perfumes, scented lotions, hair sprays, shampoos, soaps or cosmetics. Also limit the number of shiny objects you wear, such as jewelry and buckles.
  • Cover all exposed areas of your body with insect repellent and reapply frequently.

Stingers: Bees, Wasps, Yellow Jackets and Hornets

Stinger-type insects attack when their nests are disturbed. As you hike, pay attention to your surroundings for potential nest locations, such as in hollow trees, hanging from branches, under logs, in the ground, and sometimes in the mud or dirt banks of streams.

Flies and Mosquitoes

All flies can transmit diseases. To protect yourself, avoid traveling during peak insect season, or wear insect repellent and cover exposed skin with protective clothing, such as long-sleeved shirt and long pants snug at the wrists and ankles, heavy socks, and a hat.

Mosquito

Mosquitoes are scarce during the hottest times of the day and when winds rise above 10 miles per hour. Credit: John Tann

Mosquitoes are repelled by bug spray, but the best protection is covering as much skin as possible. You should also avoid stagnant water or fields of damp grass.

Ticks

Tick

Ticks cling to the edges of leaves in order to latch onto your skin or clothing as you brush by. Credit: Ryszard/Flickr

For more information on checking for ticks, check out Tick Checking 101.

First Aid Treatment:

Most reactions to insect bites and stings are mild, resulting in redness, itching, stinging or minor swelling. To treat bites or stings:

  1. Remove the stinger if needed – try scraping it out with the flat of a knife or a credit card. The stinger will continue to release venom after the bee is dead.
  2. Wash affected area with soap and water.
  3. Reduce pain and swelling with a cool compress. If the injury is on an arm or a leg, elevate it.
  4. Apply hydrocortisone cream, calamine lotion or baking soda paste to the bite or sting several times daily until your symptoms go away.
  5. Take an antihistamine to reduce itching.

Symptoms usually disappear in 1 to 2 days.

Do your best to avoid these plants and insects while on the trail – but if you do come into contact with them, make sure to use first aid treatment. Remember to call your doctor if your symptoms worsen.


Remember to share your hiking experiences this summer with American Forests and Eddie Bauer by tagging photos on your social media with @EddieBauer (and @AmericanForests, too!) and use #WhyIHike and #contest. A grand prize winner gets an amazing hiking excursion for two!

The post Look Out for These Hiking Hazards appeared first on American Forests.

30 years after Hansen’s testimony

“The greenhouse effect is here.”
– Jim Hansen, 23rd June 1988, Senate Testimony

The first transient climate projections using GCMs are 30 years old this year, and they have stood up remarkably well.

We’ve looked at the skill in the Hansen et al (1988) (pdf) simulations before (back in 2008), and we said at the time that the simulations were skillful and that differences from observations would be clearer with a decade or two’s more data. Well, another decade has passed!

How should we go about assessing past projections? There have been updates to historical data (what we think really happened to concentrations, emissions etc.), none of the future scenarios (A, B, and C) were (of course) an exact match to what happened, and we now understand (and simulate) more of the complex drivers of change which were not included originally.

The easiest assessment is the crudest. What were the temperature trends predicted and what were the trends observed? The simulations were run in 1984 or so, and that seems a reasonable beginning date for a trend calculation through to the last full year available, 2017. The modeled changes were as follows:

  • Scenario A: 0.33±0.03ºC/decade (95% CI)
  • Scenario B: 0.28±0.03ºC/decade (95% CI)
  • Scenario C: 0.16±0.03ºC/decade (95% CI)

The observed changes 1984-2017 are 0.19±0.03ºC/decade (GISTEMP), or 0.21±0.03ºC/decade (Cowtan and Way), lying between Scenario B and C, and notably smaller than Scenario A. Compared to 10 years ago, the uncertainties on the trends have halved, and so the different scenarios are more clearly distinguished. By this measure it is clear that the scenarios bracketed the reality (as they were designed to), but did not match it exactly. Can we say more by looking at the details of what was in the scenarios more specifically? Yes, we can.

This is what the inputs into the climate model were (CO2, N2O, CH4 and CFC amounts) compared to observations (through to 2014):

Estimates of CO2 growth in Scenarios A and B were quite good, but estimates of N2O and CH4 overshot what happened (estimates of global CH4 have been revised down since the 1980s). CFCs were similarly overestimated (except in scenario C which was surprisingly prescient!). Note that when scenarios were designed and started (in 1983), the Montreal Protocol had yet to be signed, and so anticipated growth in CFCs in Scenarios A and B was pessimistic. The additional CFC changes in Scenario A compared to Scenario B were intended to produce a maximum estimate of what other forcings (ozone pollution, other CFCs etc.) might have done.

But the model sees the net effect of all the trace gases (and whatever other effects are included, which in this case is mainly volcanoes). So what was the net forcing since 1984 in each scenario?

There are multiple ways of defining the forcings, and the exact value in any specific model is a function of the radiative transfer code and background climatology. Additionally, knowing exactly what the forcings in the real world have been is hard to do precisely. Nonetheless, these subtleties are small compared to the signal, and it’s clear that the forcings in Scenario A and B will have overshot the real world.

If we compare the H88 forcings since 1984 to an estimate of the total anthropogenic forcings calculated for the CMIP5 experiments (1984 through to 2012), the main conclusion is very clear – forcing in scenario A is almost a factor of two larger (and growing) than our best estimate of what happened, and scenario B overshoots by about 20-30%. By contrast, scenario C undershoots by about 40% (which gets worse over time). The slight differences because of the forcing definition, whether you take forcing efficacy into account and independent estimates of the effects of aerosols etc. are small effects. We can also ignore the natural forcings here (mostly volcanic), which is also a small effect over the longer term (Scenarios B and C had an “El Chichon”-like volcano go off in 1995).

The amount that scenario B overshoots the CMIP5 forcing is almost equal to the over-estimate of the CFC trends. Without that, it would have been spot on (the over-estimates of CH4 and N2O are balanced by missing anthropogenic forcings).

The model predictions were skillful

Predictive skill is defined as the whether the model projection is better than you would have got assuming some reasonable null hypothesis. With respect to these projections, this was looked at by Hargreaves (2010) and can be updated here. The appropriate null hypothesis (which at the time would have been the most skillful over the historical record) would be a prediction of persistence of the 20 year mean, ie. the 1964-1983 mean anomaly. Whether you look at the trends or annual mean data, this gives positive skill for all the model projections regardless of the observational dataset used. i.e. all scenarios gave better predictions than a forecast based on persistence.

What do these projections tell us about the real world?

Can we make an estimate of what the model would have done with the correct forcing? Yes. The trends don’t completely scale with the forcing but a reduction of 20-30% in the trends of Scenario B to match the estimated forcings from the real world would give a trend of 0.20-0.22ºC/decade – remarkably close to the observations. One might even ask how would the sensitivity of the model need to be changed to get the observed trend? The equilibrium climate sensitivity of the Hansen model was 4.2ºC for doubled CO2, and so you could infer that a model with a sensitivity of say, 3.6ºC, would likely have had a better match (assuming that the transient climate response scales with the equilibrium value which isn’t quite valid).

Hansen was correct to claim that greenhouse warming had been detected

In June 1988, at the Senate hearing linked above, Hansen stated clearly that he was 99% sure that we were already seeing the effects of anthropogenic global warming. This is a statement about the detection of climate change – had the predicted effect ‘come out of the noise’ of internal variability and other factors? And with what confidence?

In retrospect, we can examine this issue more carefully. By estimating the response we would see in the global means from just natural forcings, and including a measure of internal variability, we should be able to see when the global warming signal emerged.

20th C temperatures with only natural forcings

The shading in the figure (showing results from the CMIP5 GISS ModelE2), is a 95% confidence interval around the “all natural forcings” simulations. From this it’s easy to see that temperatures in 1988 (and indeed, since about 1978) fall easily outside the uncertainty bands. 99% confidence is associated with data more than ~2.6 standard deviations outside of the expected range, and even if you think that the internal variability is underestimated in this figure (double it to be conservative), the temperatures in any year past 1985 are more than 3 s.d. above the “natural” expectation. That is surely enough clarity to retrospectively support Hansen’s claim.

At the time however, the claim was more controversial; modeling was in it’s early stages, and estimates of internal variability and the relevant forcings were poorer, and so Hansen was going out on a little bit of a limb based on his understanding and insight into the problem. But he was right.

Misrepresentations and lies

Over the years, many people have misrepresented what was predicted and what could have been expected. Most (in)famously, Pat Michaels testified in Congress about climate changes and claimed that the predictions were wrong by 300% (!) – but his conclusion was drawn from a doctored graph (Cato Institute version) of the predictions where he erased the lower two scenarios:

Misleading graph from Michaels/Cato Institute (1998)

Undoubtedly there will be claims this week that Scenario A was the most accurate projection of the forcings [Narrator: It was not]. Or they will show only the CO2 projection (and ignore the other factors). Similarly, someone will claim that the projections have been “falsified” because the temperature trends in Scenario B are statistically distinguishable from those in the real world. But this sleight of hand is trying to conflate a very specific set of hypotheses (the forcings combined with the model used) which no-one expects (or expected) to perfectly match reality, with the much more robust and valid prediction that the trajectory of greenhouse gases would lead to substantive warming by now – as indeed it has.

References


  1. J. Hansen, I. Fung, A. Lacis, D. Rind, S. Lebedeff, R. Ruedy, G. Russell, and P. Stone, “Global climate changes as forecast by Goddard Institute for Space Studies three-dimensional model”, Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 93, pp. 9341, 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/JD093iD08p09341


  2. J.C. Hargreaves, “Skill and uncertainty in climate models”, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, vol. 1, pp. 556-564, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wcc.58

6 Edible Plants That Might Surprise You

June 21st, 2018|Tags: |0 Comments

By Dorothy Hastings, American Forests

If you are ever stranded in the wilderness of the U.S., unsure which direction is the nearest grocery store or restaurant, fear not. The forest is your supermarket, and it is time to go shopping! Below is a list of six edible plants (and fungi) found in different parts of the U.S.

Chicory

Habitat: Open fields or along roadsides and concrete.

Season: Summer

Some may be put off by the bitter taste of this blue beauty, but there is more than one way to enjoy this wild treat! The raw leaves of the chicory plant can be eaten in a sandwich or salad. Some people enjoy boiling or braising the leaves to get rid of the bitter taste. The roots of the chicory flower can even be used as a coffee substitute. To do this, cut off the ends of the roots, cook them until they turn brown, grind them and brew them like coffee grinds. Chicory leaves and roots are rich in vitamins and a great source of fiber. They also treat cuts, relieve anxiety, and boost the immune system.

Pinyon Pine

Credit: Forestry Images

Habitat: Semi-arid regions in the southwestern U.S.

Season: Late-August through October, every four to seven years

If you find yourself stranded in a forest around lunch time, you might be pining for a snack! You can head to the nearest pine tree to get a three-course meal from its seeds, needles and bark (all pine tree seeds are edible, but not all pine trees are). If you’re looking for an especially tasty treat, try the pine seeds of the pinyon pine. Many southwestern Native American tribes have been eating these nutrient-rich nuts for thousands of years. The seeds are easiest to extract when the pine cones are dry, brown and open. Once shelled, they can be eaten raw, roasted or chopped, and made into cookies, soup or even pine nut liquor. Next, try the pinyon’s inner bark, which you can bake, fry or boil. To finish off your forest feast, gather up the pine needles and boil them into a refreshing and medicinal tea high in vitamin C!

Chicken of the Woods

Habitat: Eastern and northern U.S. forests

Season: Late-summer and fall

Eating a wild mushroom is something many are not comfortable trying, but this mushroom is easy to identify, full of protein and vitamins, and tastes like chicken! The two species, known as Laetiporus sulphureus (yellow-pored) and Laetiporus cincinnatus (white-pored), look like large bright-orange shelves growing at the base of many oak and other hardwood trees. The younger, more colorful ones are soft and savory, but always make sure to try a small amount determine if you are allergic. Avoid ones growing on conifers, eucalyptus and cedar trees, as they will make you sick. This mushroom is a great meat alternative to fry, bake or sauté. Try throwing some in an omelette or making chicken of the woods fried rice.

Cattail

cattail

Location: Wetlands

Season: Year round

If you find yourself stuck in a wetland area, this survival food may save you. Although it may look like a hairy hot dog, it sure doesn’t taste like one! Once the cattail has been pulled up from the root, peel back the outer layer and eat the white base of the stalk and lower leaves, or enjoy the roots known as the “rhizomes.” Although all parts are edible raw, they can taste bland or even bitter, so many prefer to boil or fry them. You can also use crushed roots or the yellow pollen of the cattail as nutritious flour for bread or cake!

Pickleweed

Credit: Carine06/Flickr

Habitat: Coastal salt marshes

Season: Summer

These savory succulents are best enjoyed in the summer months when they are green, firm and ready for munching. Pickleweed, scientifically known as Salicornia, but sometimes called sea beanshas a salty crunch similar with that of a pickle when eaten raw. If you want to have some flavorful fun, steam or cook them with your favorite catch of the day!

Pineapple-weed

pineapple weed

Habitat: Along roads or concrete.

Season: Summer

This fragrant weed is great for hikers who are looking for an energizing snack, but I prefer to make it into a sweet tea! Chop up the dried cone-shaped flower heads and steep them in boiling water to brew a chamomile-like tea. The plant can also be used to treat a variety of issues like stress, pain, insomnia and indigestion.


Authors note: Please make sure you are not damaging plants or surrounding habitat when you are trying these wild treats! Also, do not eat anything in the wild unless you have positively identified it and can safely consume.  

The post 6 Edible Plants That Might Surprise You appeared first on American Forests.

#ForestBreak: Merchants Millpond State Park

June 20th, 2018|Tags: |0 Comments

.fusion-fullwidth-4 {
padding-left: px !important;
padding-right: px !important;
}

On a recent excursion to Merchants Millpond State Park in North Carolina, an American Forests staff member captured this perfect slice of time in the forest. Take a listen to the peaceful sounds of wind in the trees and the songs of birds!

For more #ForestBreak photos and videos, follow American Forests on Instagram!

The post #ForestBreak: Merchants Millpond State Park appeared first on American Forests.

Firewatch: A Walk Through a Video Game Forest

June 19th, 2018|Tags: , |0 Comments

.fusion-fullwidth-1 {
padding-left: px !important;
padding-right: px !important;
}

By Nick Del Giudice, American Forests

Firewatch rocky canyon

Credit: Campo Santo Studios

Sunsets, gorgeous trees and solitude are all key elements to a good hike. In 2015, Campo Santo Studios, a young collective of seasoned video game developers, delivered a second-person experiential game. From the beginning, “Firewatch” was designed to immerse the player in both the wilderness of Wyoming’s Shoshone National Forest and the emotional struggles of our protagonist, Henry.

Firewatch Forest

Credit: Campo Santo Studios

Henry is a wildland fire lookout. Fire lookouts have been a long romanticized and a rapidly disappearing breed of conservationist. The disappearance of the wilderness lookout is due to technological advances and a better understanding of the value of fire to the health of our forests. However, the romance is understandable — being paid to live up high among the trees and mountains, waking up with the sun and a perfect view. Although there are very few actual fire lookouts left, many of the old lookout towers can be rented as wilderness retreats. For the rest of us, there is “Firewatch” the game: a glimpse into the beautiful world of a wilderness lookout and the complex emotions of a person experiencing isolation in the wild.

Firewatch tower

Credit: Campo Santo Studios

It can be helpful to approach “Firewatch” not as a game, but as an experience. The actual game-play is easy to pick up and action isn’t the focus of the game. There are few props and no omniscience for the player — you only have the information Henry does; this lifelike minimalism completes the immersion. This is refreshing in the world of video games in which first-person action is usually accompanied by a heads-up display with all manner of information the character has no way of knowing in order to make the game easier. In “Firewatch,” there is no floating path in the air or magical GPS; you have a map. If you think you’re headed in the wrong direction, consult your compass. There is an authenticity to “Firewatch,” a step back from the modern world delivered via a high-tech video game.

Firewatch Poster

Credit: Campo Santo Studios

Like many great real-life hikes, the appeal mostly comes from the visual experience. The visual style of “Firewatch” is both stunning, novel and somehow familiar. The game’s artistic director, Olly Moss is a graphic designer from the U.K. specializing in recreating movie posters. The inspiration for the game design is none other than the early-20th-century promotional posters issued by the National Park Service (NPS) and the U.S. Forest Service. While the posters may have informed the style of the game, the substance is purely the American West. Writer Sean Vanaman told us about his childhood, enjoying the great outdoors in Wyoming’s Absaroka Wilderness, and developing the game.

“We needed the rest of the team to have experiences in the mountains of the American West,” Vanaman said. “Multiple team members are from England, so we took everyone to Yosemite and pulled as much reference of scale and expanse as possible.”

Video game environments are often just a setting, but in “Firewatch” the environment is the key to the story. With “Firewatch,” outdoors enthusiasts can find another outlet to express their passion and perhaps someone who would otherwise not interact with wilderness to get outside.

“[We] felt like if we could make a game that was beautiful enough and celebrated the wilderness as much as possible, it would, in turn, make customers care the way we did and create interest in getting out there themselves,” said Vanaman. “We’ve had countless fans email us that this worked for them. Some now volunteer for the NPS, others have become avid campers and outdoorsmen after spending years and years inside. It’s pretty amazing.”

The experience of exploring public lands is an inspiration to many at Campo Santo Studios, including Vanaman.

“These spaces are one of the things that make this country incredible,” he said. “So many countries don’t have what we have — land you can go do what you want on that hasn’t been taken over by someone else with a pocketbook.”

By showcasing the wonder of public lands in a multimedia format, perhaps some people without the ability to visit our wild spaces will be inspired. Vanaman, who was born in Ireland, remarked on the loss of forests across Western Europe and why conservation is so important.

“Becoming a steward of these places was essential to the way I grew up thinking about America,” he said. “I’m quite proud we were able to celebrate them in a small way inside of ‘Firewatch.’”

Firewatch Sunset

Credit: Campo Santo Studios

The post Firewatch: A Walk Through a Video Game Forest appeared first on American Forests.

Forest Conservation Manager

.fusion-fullwidth-2 {
padding-left: px !important;
padding-right: px !important;
}

Department

Conservation Programs

Reports to

Director of Forest Conservation

Salary

Commensurate with experience.

Summary

The Forest Conservation Manager will support American Forests’ efforts to conserve key forest landscapes.

Requisite Education Or Certifications

Minimum of a Bachelor’s degree in environmental studies, natural resources, or forest management.

Required Experience

American Forests is focused on generating measurable, on-the-ground results that improve forest health. So, most importantly, we are looking for smart people that can get things done. We constantly look for new ways to do conservation, so an ability to learn and adapt quickly is also important.

Experience in policy, project, or program activity related to environmental, forest, or natural resource issues is required. A combination of education and experience will be considered in determining relative candidate qualifications.

Working Conditions

Most work will be in a general office environment, with some local meetings outside of the office. American Forests is located in downtown Washington, D.C., within walking distance of Metro stations on all lines, multiple bus lines, and Capital Bikeshare. Some travel (<10%) will be required outside of the Washington, D.C. area to engage with partners and assess projects.

Specific Duties

  • Serve as American Forests’ project expert
    • Provide technical assistance to partners and forest conservation community on how to develop successful landscape scale restoration projects using concepts from silviculture, forest ecology, conservation biology, and climate science.
    • Use robust set of models to estimate benefits of forest conservation. Metrics to include carbon sequestration, water quantity, water quality, air quality and habitat.
    • Develop follow-up protocols to document progress, successes and challenges over time and validate benefits.
    • Conduct site visits to assess results of restoration projects build local partnerships.
    • Develop methods for current and past projects to inform broader restoration strategies.
    • Use Forest Inventory and Analysis, forest industry, conservation and other datasets to inform project strategies and outcomes.
    • Serve as GIS team leader—developing map products and overseeing mapping projects.
    • Build relationships with restoration partners and forest conservation community.
    • Assist in developing program strategies.
  • Administer American ReLeaf program
    • Manage the American ReLeaf grant solicitation, payment, and award process.
    • Maintain internal project database to track project outcomes.
    • Coordinate closely with Development and Finance Departments to collect information and maintain records on restoration projects.
    • Support Development and Communications teams by providing information on project outcomes, story lines and costs.
    • Periodically, write blogs and other communication pieces.

To Apply

To apply, send a cover letter and resume to Eric Sprague, Director of Forest Conservation, at jobs@americanforests.org. The position will remain open until filled.

American Forests is an equal opportunity employer.

The post Forest Conservation Manager appeared first on American Forests.

Why I’m Here: Protecting Our Wildlife

June 18th, 2018|Tags: , |0 Comments

.fusion-fullwidth-1 {
padding-left: px !important;
padding-right: px !important;
}

By Courtney Guillen, American Forests

I grew up in the Lower Rio Grande Valley — an incredibly unique area for many reasons, including its rich cultural intersection between Texas and Mexico. However, the most interesting part of the Valley might be its unique natural environment. I spent many formative summers riding around on my bike under the intense sun, looking for interesting worms and turtles to observe, and holding backyard funerals for any dead frogs I found.

Courtney on a trail

Although I wasn’t aware of it growing up, the Lower Rio Grande Valley (LRGV) is the most biodiverse habitat in the United States. The area has a subtropical climate that invites thousands of different species of birds every winter. At any moment while hiking around the Santa Ana Wildlife Refuge, beautiful green jays and Altamira orioles can be spotted. Although the LRGV is a top-notch birding destination, the area has much more to offer. The Valley is home to several hundred different species of butterflies and beetles, and over a thousand different species of plants, including unique plants that can typically only be found in desert and tropical climates. Most notably, though, the Rio Grande Valley houses 18 different endangered species, including the ocelot. I remember being warned while walking around the Laguna Atascosa Refuge to beware of ocelots. The sad truth, however, is that ocelots are now uncommon. While there used to be hundreds of thousands of ocelots in the southern United States, there are now only about 50. This massive decrease in population is largely due to loss of habitat — roughly 95 percent of the ocelot’s U.S. range was converted into land used for agriculture or development.

Through American Forests’ American ReLeaf program, we use reforestation to restore threatened ecosystems and protect endangered wildlife. Since 1997, American Forests has planted over 2 million Texas thornscrub plants in the LRGV, which serve as breeding grounds for ocelots. Although restoring the ocelot population to a safer level will take many more years and thousands more acres of Texas thornscrub, American Forests understands the value in providing habitats to protect threatened and endangered species from going extinct in south Texas and all over the United States.

I am excited to be working for American Forests so that I can be involved with a nonprofit that literally changed the landscape of my hometown area for the better. Working for American Forests also gives me the opportunity to combine my passions for wildlife protection and environmental policy to create real impact for the betterment of the Earth and for our animal neighbors.

The post Why I’m Here: Protecting Our Wildlife appeared first on American Forests.

Forest Digest: June 17, 2018

June 17th, 2018|Tags: , |0 Comments

.fusion-fullwidth-1 {
padding-left: px !important;
padding-right: px !important;
}

Check out what’s happened this past week in forestry news!

DC to kick off federal census of its urban forestSmartCitiesDrive

Washington D.C. will become the first city to fully fund a tree census. The motive behind this initiative is to help the city make better use of its natural resources and further increase the benefits gained from urban forests.

Baobab trees have more than 300 uses but they’re dying in Africa – The Conversation

Nine out of 13 of Africa’s largest and oldest Baobab trees have died in the last decade. Scientists speculate this is a result of climate change. These trees, which can be up to 2,500 years old, are environmentally and culturally important.

Can a whiskey save Washington’s only native oak tree species?The New Food Economy

Native Garry Oaks are in danger of going extinct. However Garryana Whiskey is trying to prevent that. By replanting the same species it uses to make barrels, the company hopes to raise awareness for the Garry Oak and other trees like it.

Gardeners: Plant flowers to nourish bees, hummingbirdsThe Register Guard

With bees becoming more and more threatened, gardeners should focus on plants that are pollinator friendly. A large variety of different flowering plants, including wildflowers and trees, is recommended.

Lawmakers advance climate programs, even RepublicansClimate Wire

Contrary to popular belief, climate change is not a partisan issue. With increases in environmental damage, Republican lawmakers are looking to mitigate climate change.

The post Forest Digest: June 17, 2018 appeared first on American Forests.

6 Hiking Essentials

June 15th, 2018|Tags: , , |0 Comments

.fusion-fullwidth-3 {
padding-left: px !important;
padding-right: px !important;
}

By Nick Del Giudice, American Forests

As a beginning hiker, it can be daunting to determine what gear you actually need. The good news is that there are only a few pieces of equipment that are necessary, while others are highly recommended. Here is our list of six essentials for hiking today!

Sustenance

camping food and drink

This may be a no-brainer, but the only way to prevent dehydration is to carry enough water for your whole journey. Much like water, you won’t get very far on an empty stomach. For day hikes, pack snacks such as jerky, granola bars, fruit or peanut butter, all of which will provide calories as well as protein to keep you fueled up.

Footwear

Hiking boots

There is no other single piece of gear that will have such a large impact on your hiking happiness than your choice of footwear. Depending on your hike and your personal taste, there are a variety of options spanning from lightweight sandals to full on mountaineering boots.

Sandals

Some thru-hikers swear by their sandals and will wear them for whole scenic trails, while others won’t even give them a chance. One thing is certain, your feet are exposed; they’ll dry quickly, stay cool and experience less fatigue, but they’ll also be susceptible to stubs, debris and whatever else the trail brings.

Trail Runners

These are the off-road equivalent of running shoes. With a rugged sole, excellent support and world-class breathability, these are the preferred footwear of most distance thru-hikers.

Hiking Boots

There are three classes of hikers ranging from light to heavy, and each is good for a different kind of hike. Lightweight hikers are generally low-top hiking type shoes. Many models have waterproof liners that can detract from the breathability, but can add a significant amount of weather protection. Midweight hikers are the most traditional hiking boots. They are heavier than the lightweight hiker, with strong support, a tough exterior and, in most cases, strong ankle support. Heavyweight hikers are typically waterproof and their stiff, supportive soles make them the best boots for winter hikes or hikes over extremely rough terrain.

Mountaineering Boots

These are the toughest and most structured and restrictive footwear option for hiking. Because mountaineering boots were originally designed for scaling raw rock and ice climbing, they have an immensely stiff and protective sole, as well as hardcore insulation and waterproofing.

Weather-Appropriate Clothes

Hiker on Snowy Mountain

Check the forecast on the trail before you go, and dress accordingly! When it is warm out, make sure your layers wick moisture away from the body, are lightweight and provide some manner of sun protection. For cooler weather, have more layers instead of thicker layers to allow for flexibility in temperature regulation. Always pack a waterproof layer in the case of inclement weather.

Multi-tool/knife

Making a fire

There are many uses for a sharp blade or any of the various tools that come on a standard multi-tool/pocketknife. While you may not use all of them, the tool doesn’t weigh that much and could save the day, whether by opening a can or making an impromptu shelter and fire.

Navigation

Compass and map

Many hikers use their phones for navigation on the trail, and many local/regional trails are so well populated and marked that real navigation gear is unnecessary. However, for those of you that are looking to go off trail or backwoods, having basic navigation equipment and knowing how to use it is essential. Supplement those trail map apps with an up-to-date waterproof map and a magnetic compass.

First Aid Kit

first aid kit

A first aid kit is essential to every hike. For a day hike, your kit should at least have bandages/gauze, anti-septic, sterile gloves and acetaminophen or ibuprofen. However, for longer and more difficult hikes, your med kit should be more extensive items, such as a tourniquet or supplies to tie a splint. The goal of any good first aid kit is to have the tools necessary to stabilize you or someone else in an emergency situation until help arrives.


This is by no means a complete list of what you need to hike, but this list is a good place to begin. When you do get out there, share your experience with American Forests and our partner, Eddie Bauer, by tagging photos on your social media with @AmericanForests and #WhyIHike. You could win one of three hiking destinations!

The post 6 Hiking Essentials appeared first on American Forests.