5 Remarkable Women in Conservation

March 14th, 2017|Tags: , |0 Comments

.fusion-fullwidth-1 {
padding-left: px !important;
padding-right: px !important;
}

By Suah Cheong, American Forests

woman in forestDid you know that March is Women’s History Month? American Forests is celebrating by recognizing some of the remarkable achievements of female conservationists. Often working in the shadows of their more well-known male counterparts, these women helped create the conservation movement we see today.

Recognizing these women’s accomplishments is not only deserved, but also necessary to reach our conservation goals. If it weren’t for their strong leadership and commitment to the planet, we wouldn’t see many of the environmental protection measures we have in place today. We hope to follow in their footsteps and create positive change for the generations to come!

Rosalie Edge (1877 – 1962)

Rosalie Edge was a suffragist and species preservation advocate. During her career, she urged her peers in the conservation world to take measures to protect a wider range of bird species. In 1934, she founded Hawk Mountain Sanctuary in Pennsylvania, the world’s first preserve for birds of prey. Edge also successfully led grassroots campaigns and lobbied congress to create national parks and purchase old-growth forest.

Margaret “Mardy” Murie (1902 – 2003)

Margaret “Mardy” Murie is considered the “grandmother of conservation.” A wildlife activist and ecologist, Murie worked to accomplish important wildness victories such as the establishment and expansion of Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in 1964. Just before her death in 2003, 101-year-old Murie was awarded a Conservationist of the Year award.

Rachel Carson (1907 – 1964)

Rachel Carson worked for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in 1943, but it was not until she resigned in 1952 to continue her writing career that she made groundbreaking changes to the conservation world. Her bestselling book, Silent Spring, brought the environmental movement to the mainstream by documenting the detrimental effects of pesticides on the environment and highlighting the need for regulations.

Wangari Maathai (1940 – 2011)

Wangari Maathai, an environmental and political activist from Nairobi, Kenya, founded the Green Belt Movement in 1977. This organization focuses on environmental conservation, tree planting and women’s rights. Maathai also became a Nobel Peace Prize recipient in 2004 for her “contribution to sustainable development, democracy and peace.”

Mollie Beattie (1947 – 1996)

Mollie Beattie was the first female director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. She was integral in landmark environmental laws like the Endangered Species Act and the Clean Water Act. During her time there, Beattie oversaw the reintroduction of the grey wolf into the northern Rocky Mountains and the creation of 15 new wildlife refuges.

The post 5 Remarkable Women in Conservation appeared first on American Forests.

Predictable and unpredictable behaviour

Terms such as “gas skeptics” and “climate skeptics” aren’t really very descriptive, but they refer to sentiments that have something in common: unpredictable behaviour.

Statistics is remarkably predictable
The individual gas molecules are highly unpredictable, but the bulk properties of the gases are nevertheless very predictable thanks to physics. More specifically the laws of thermodynamics and the ideal gas law.

The bulk aspects of the gases are a result of the statistical properties of a vast number of particles. Statistics is surprisingly predictable even if the individual cases are not.

Just look at Las Vegas and the insurance industry which make a living on the fact that probabilities (statistics) are predictable. Even economists pin their hope on statistics, and the medical sciences would never be where they are now without the predictive power of statistics.

A “gas skeptic” would say that you cannot predict the state of the gas because the molecules are unpredictable. This is analogous to saying that climatic states cannot be predicted because the weather is unpredictable (a “climate skeptic”).

Climate is weather statistics
Climate can be viewed as weather statistics. Early climatological work was dedicated to survey of how the weather statistics varied from place to place and over the seasons.

There are clear effects of physical factors (latitude, mountains, distance to the coast) on the statistical character of the weather and the weather statistics (climate).

In other words, the statistical properties are a result of the physical processes and conditions present and are readily predicted from e.g. geographical factors, seasonal variations in the solar inclination, the atmospheric composition and the planet’s distance to the Sun.

The weather statistics (eg probabilities) are predictable in spite of the chaotic and nonlinear character of weather itself.

Common misconceptions
There are some examples where the question about predicting the exact state is mixed up with the question of predicting the statistical properties of the system, even by people with some experience in climate research.

Some of them are useful for further learning, and there is a number of them in a ‘report’ (“Climate models for the layman”) that Judith Curry has written for a British interest group that calls itself “GWPF”.

Curry’s report has also been used to back Norwegian contrarians who support the effort of a populist politician to get a seat in the parliament.

The analogy to a “gas skeptic” above illustrates why Curry’s claim is misconceived because it is false that the climate models are unfit to make predictions about the future climate just because the atmosphere behaves in a nonlinear fashion due to the Navier-Stokes equations.

The Navier-Stokes equations describe the atmospheric flow (winds), but the key equations for climate change involve the laws of thermodynamics and the way the different gases absorb different frequencies in the electromagnetic spectrum.

The most important nonlinear component in this respect include scattering processes, phase transitions, and cloud formation.

A potential feedback paradox
Curry also introduces a potential paradox in her report when she emphasises natural variations. The magnitude of natural temperature variation are regulated by feedback processes and have physical causes. The climate sensitivity also involve such feedback processes.

Any feedback process based on temperature will act on both natural and forced changes in the temperature. If such feedbacks result in pronounced natural temperature variations, they also imply that the climate sensitivity is high.

Examples of such feedbacks include increased atmospheric humidity and reduced snow/ice cover. Processes involving clouds are more uncertain, but they too are likely to be affected by temperature (convection) and act to modify the climatic response.

Natural variations may arise from both variations in the climatic state (eg ENSO, NAO, and PDO) or from external causes, such as changes in the sun and volcanic eruptions.

There are also feedbacks relevant to forced variation as well as internal variability which don’t always mean that higher amplitude natural variability necessarily indicates greater climate sensitivity.

For example, the fact that there is enhanced variability in the 3-7 year ENSO band is a result of climate dynamics (Bjerkenes feedbacks) resonating with wave propagation timescales.

Other examples include distinct oscillatory models of variability with decadal and longer timescales, related also to oceanic Rossby wave propagation and gyre spinup processes, or timescales associated with the AMOC.

It is possible to get enhanced variability on those timescales as a result of dynamical mechanisms without needing to appeal to higher climate sensitivity.

Nevertheless, the bottom line is that Curry must prove that the feedbacks involved in the natural variations are different to those affecting the climate sensitivity before she can conclude that natural variability dominates over a warming due to increasing greenhouse gases.

It’s not the sun
When Curry believes that the changes in earth’s temperature are due changes in the sun, it is important to keep in mind that the variations in the sun only affect as a small fraction of earth’s energy input. Amplifying feedback processes are needed to explain the magnitude of the observed changes.

Curry makes a point of the temperature increase before the 1940s, and that the CO2 concentrations were low then. But she seems to have forgotten that the forcing is proportional to the logarithm of the concentration: the effect of an increase is initially higher with lower concentrations.

The changes in the climate before 1940 were a result a combination of factors when there was an increase in the number of sunspots that coincided with increasing CO2-concentrations.

It is well-known that the sunspot record suggests an increase up to the 1950, but various solar indicators indicate no long-term trend in the sun since the 1950.

Only the increase in the greenhouse gases can explain a forced warming since the 1950s because no other physical forcings exhibit long-term trends since then.

Problematic statistics
Another issue is that early temperature record does not give as complete global data coverage as more recent measurements. The global temperature analysis is based on smaller sample in the early part, for which we expect to see stronger random sampling fluctuations.

This is consistent with what Figure 4 in Curry’s report shows. However, she misinterpreted this as being strong natural variability in the early part of the record.

Curry also makes the same mistake as John Christy by using the ensemble mean as a yardstick for the models (here): model evaluations must be based on the individual simulations taking into account the spread of the ensemble run.

It’s not just the temperature
The climate sensitivity is one indicator for the consequences of a global warming which only accounts for the change in temperature, but it is important not to ignore that changes in the global hydrological cycle may also have a severe impact on society.

It is possible that a weaker temperature increase is associated with a larger shift in the convective activity and more pronounced changes in the rainfall patterns (Benestad, 2016).

The comprehensive picture and consistency
I often find it useful to look at the comprehensive picture in science and look for consistencies, both when it comes to physics and the logic.

A curious twist in Curry’s report is (a) her claim that climate models have exaggerated climate sensitivity because they did not reproduce the observed warming over the 2000-2015 period and then (b) her emphasis on natural variations having scales of “weeks, years, decades, centuries and millennia”.

If the claims hypothetically were correct, then how would she know that the temperature variations over brief intervals are not just a result of the natural variations that she emphasised?

We should expect some brief periods with both rapid as well as slow warming (Easterling and Wehner, 2009), and some of the model simulations have indicated a weak warming over the same period. This is explained in the IPCC AR5 (Box 9.2).

Another question is whether the warming rate reported by the AR5 was correct, and more recent studies suggest artificially weak warming connected to changing observational networks (Karl et al, 2015). This has been discussed here. Hence, Curry’s claim about slower warming rates has lost substance.

Surprising
There is a curious remark in Curry’s report about the climate models’ inability to match the phase and timing of the natural variations. Yes, it is true, but it is also a well-known fact.

The way it is stated in the report makes me think that Curry has not understood what the climate modelling community is trying to do, however. My suspicion is strengthened when she makes a point about the model simulations not including future changes in the sun and volcanic eruptions.

The elementary misconceptions revealed by Curry’s “Climate Models for the layman” surprise me. Does she really not understand the flaws presented here or is she trying to sow confusion?

References


  1. R.E. Benestad, “A mental picture of the greenhouse effect”, Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00704-016-1732-y


  2. D.R. Easterling, and M.F. Wehner, “Is the climate warming or cooling?”, Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 36, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009GL037810


  3. T.R. Karl, A. Arguez, B. Huang, J.H. Lawrimore, J.R. McMahon, M.J. Menne, T.C. Peterson, R.S. Vose, and H. Zhang, “Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus”, Science, vol. 348, pp. 1469-1472, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa5632

Forest Digest — Week of March 6th, 2017

March 10th, 2017|Tags: |0 Comments

.fusion-fullwidth-1 {
padding-left: px !important;
padding-right: px !important;
}

Find out the latest in forest news in this week’s Forest Digest!

Elephant

Credit: Vincent Poulissen via Flickr.

  • Quantum computer learns to ‘see’ trees — Sciencemag.org
    Scientists have trained a quantum computer to recognize trees, which bring researchers a step close to using such computers for complicated machine-learning problems in tree research like pattern recognition and computer vision.
  • How nature creates forest diversity — Phys.org
    A new study published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences provides a first model that elucidates the ecological and evolutionary mechanisms underlying diversity in forests.
  • Exclusive Look Into How Rare Elephants’ Forests Are DisappearingNational Geographic
    Palm oil, which is the basis of products like cosmetics and processed foods, is versatile and has a long shelf life. However, palm oil plantations devastate forests — and not always legally. A new report by the NGO Rainforest Action Network details the illegal razing of lowland forest, critical habitat for Sumatran elephants, by an oil palm grower.
  • Trees’ ability to store carbon in doubt after groundbreaking Australian study — Phys.org
    The ability of trees to offset carbon emissions has been questioned after a Western Sydney University study found common Australian trees are unable to store as much carbon as previously thought. The findings have significant implications for models used by international climate agencies, many of which assume that rising carbon dioxide will fertilize trees and result in more growth and capture of CO2 from the air.

The post Forest Digest — Week of March 6th, 2017 appeared first on American Forests.

Seeing Nature through the Eyes of 5 Photographers

March 9th, 2017|Tags: |0 Comments

.fusion-fullwidth-1 {
padding-left: px !important;
padding-right: px !important;
}

By Sydney Straschnov, American Forests

Photography has the power to inspire, influence and transport viewers to places they’ve never been before. But, what if you could accompany a photographer on their journey to capture the perfect photograph? Award winning and renowned photographers all over the world have taken it upon themselves to give fellow aspiring artists that chance. Here is a compilation of some of the best nature and wildlife photo tours that money can buy that take you on adventures that are truly priceless.

1. Greg Clure: United States

Living at the southern tip of California, Greg Clure, a nature and wildlife photographer, leads tours along California’s coastlines, specifically the Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area and Big Sur. During the winter months, he spends time capturing tranquil beach shots and breathtaking sunsets. Why winter? Greg points out that the winter solstice places the sun in a prime position in its southernmost point to be photographed from Santa Monica. In spring he tours Big Sur, shooting the natural beauty of trickling streams, roaring waves and waterfalls falling from towering cliffs.

When he’s not leading tours he spends time traveling between California, Hawaii and the Mid-West, photographing the natural wonder that can be found in nature.

Scenic landscape

Credit: Stephen Oachs via Flickr.

2. Jeff Cremer: Peru

Jeff Cremer, after falling for the beauty and wildlife that reside in Latin America, has lived in Costa Rica and Columbia and is currently settled in Peru in a region called Tambopata. He now shares the love he has for his home with his fellow photographers, leading tours through some of the most remote areas of the Peruvian Amazon. He has been featured in National Geographic, NBC, Wired, as well as appeared on BBC’s “Weird World” for some of the discoveries he has made over the past six years of living in Peru.

birds in tree

Credit: Nguyen Ngoc Chinh via Flickr.

3. Andy Biggs: Africa, India

Travel all over the extraordinary continent of Africa with Andy Biggs, a conservationist wildlife photographer who’s photography truly displays his love for the African landscape and the diverse wildlife that live there. Tour members have the chance to experience the epic wildebeest migration, spy on the endangered mountain gorillas and travel through Botswana as the seasons change and new life enters the world. In addition, Andy has begun taking groups into the heart of India’s National Park to track the illusive wild tiger as well as visit the Taj Mahal.

Safari

4. Aaron Baggenstos: United States, Canada, Coasta Rica, Africa

An award-winning photographer and wildlife enthusiast, Aaron Baggenstos takes adventure seekers all over the world to track and photograph animals that most people may never have the chance to see in their lifetime. From grizzlies in Alaska to toucans in Costa Rica to lions in Kenya, this experienced explorer is well versed in the behavior and habits of the animals he has been capturing shots of for five years. Beyond his tour business, Aaron has been recognized by National Geographic and has been featured on the PBS television series “Wild Photo Adventure.”

Lion

Credit: Pauline Guilmot via Flickr.

5. Roy Toft: South America, Africa, Coasta Rica, North America, Madagascar, India, Galapagos Islands

Roy Toft, a wildlife expert and prestigious award-winning photographer, offers the chance to travel the globe to capture stunning professional-grade photographs of many different species, ranging from big cats to primates to birds. His work with the International League of Conservation Photography (ILCP) — which he assisted in founding — as well as National Geographic, Discovery, Smithsonian and the Wildlife Conservation has helped to advance worldwide conservation efforts. The love that he has for nature and the wildlife he photographs has spurred not only his work in photography, but also his passion for teaching other aspiring photographers.

leopard

Matt Hance via Flickr.

The post Seeing Nature through the Eyes of 5 Photographers appeared first on American Forests.

The Robin Hoods of Other Forests

March 8th, 2017|0 Comments

.fusion-fullwidth-1 {
padding-left: px !important;
padding-right: px !important;
}

By Doyle Irvin, American Forests

The band of merry outlaws carousing their way through the Sherwood Forest is well known and well covered. It’s become a formula: stealing from the rich, giving to the poor; the pretty maid flirting with the bandit chief while joking with the big oaf they call ‘Little;’ the friar tucking away into dinner with more zeal than he has for Mass; and, of course, the ubiquitous forest hideout. We’re here to share with you the famous legends of other outlaws with forest hideouts, all of whom really existed. Seriously, these are real people, who lived and breathed and loved trees like the rest of us. Whether the deeds attributed to them are true or not — well, that’s up to you to decipher. The other disheartening news is that most of these outlaws weren’t actually Disney protagonists, and that not everyone got (or deserved) their ride off into the sunset.

Twm Sion Cati (Thomas Jones)

Twm Sion Cati

Close up of a carved statue of Twm Sion Cati in Wales. Credit: Veritas Vita via waymarking.com

Born somewhere near Tregaron, Wales, in the year 1530, Twm Sion Cati is revered in the United Kingdom for being far too clever. He stole from the rich, and, well, sometimes gave to the poor — when it seemed likely to amuse. Though he spent much of his time traveling from crime to crime, Twm was known to hide from his nemesis, the Sheriff of Carmarthen, in a cave in the thickly forested Dinas Hill.

One of the most repeated tales about him recounts when a peasant asked him for assistance with stealing from a nearby merchant. Twm’s job was to distract the merchant while the peasant pilfered pitchers. Tom waltzed right into the shop, and after a minute of inspections told the merchant that one of his pitchers had a hole in it. The merchant, incensed and unconvinced, denied this accusation, so Twm asked him to test it out by feeling the inside of the pitcher. The merchant felt inside and still denied Twm’s assertion. Our bandit then replied, “How, if there was no hole, could you put your hand inside?” By this time his partner had escaped with the goods stolen during the distraction.

Twm was well known for being “sensitive,” which at the time meant “non-violent.” He would shoot arrows at you, but make sure to only hit your clothes in a way that would pin you to your saddle.[i] He later (at daggerpoint) amicably convinced the heiress of Sir John Price to marry him, and, thus, became a respectable man, maintaining a position as Justice of the Peace in the local community until he died at the age of 79.

Juraj Jánošík

Juraj Janosik

The statue of Juraj Janosik stands on a hill looking over the village.

Juraj Janosik, whose name translates to “George,” is still revered in Eastern Europe as a folk hero. Born sometime in 1688, in what is now Slovakia, Juraj was a rebel freedom fighter by the tender age of 15. Potentially confused, he is known to have then joined the imperial army. Perhaps simply gullible, he was then convinced by an inmate that he was guarding to abscond and join the inmate’s group of bandits.

There, Juraj found his true passion shortly after becoming the leader of the gang. Hiding in the forests of Slovakia, he and his gang actually did steal from aristocrats, giving the money to the poor. He also forbade bloodshed, and both of these aspects of his legend are the main reasons Slovakians love him to this day.

Juraj’s tagline became notorious throughout Slovakia, Poland and Moravia. “Stop! Your soul belongs to God and your money belongs to me!” would ring out shortly before the wealthy experienced alternative tax.[ii] In a turn towards the ludicrous, Juraj was supposedly captured in a pub, when, while on the run, he slipped on peas thrown under his feet by a malignant crone. Faced with the traditional punishment for bandit leaders, death by hook, Juraj was given the option of clemency in exchange for enlisting himself and others into the army. As the story has it, he refused, stating that “If you have baked me so you should also eat me!” — then jumping on the hook.[iii]

Salvatore Guiliano

Salvatore Guiliano

Salvatore Guiliano. Credit: Marcela Palma via Flickr.

Handsome, Sicilian, notorious, and a black market philanthropist, Salvatore Guiliano pretty much had it made. He was born in the poverty-stricken town of Montelepre, Sicily, during 1922, and he got his start in banditry during World War II. Food supplies were dangerously short throughout the 1943 Allied invasion, so Salvatore smuggled grain to the starving peasants. Accidentally (or not-so-accidentally) killing a policeman while resisting arrest, Salvatore and his gang fled to the forested mountains near Sagano, Sicily, where he would pursue outlawry for the next seven years.

Salvatore was a hero to the local villagers, as he frequently shared his profits and procured medicine for the sick — he actually named his horse “Robin Hood.”[iv] At the same time, he was also feared, because of his penchant for killing informers. In the late 1940s, he had ascended to the rank of colonel in Sicily’s underground campaign for independence, writing two letters to U.S. President Harry Truman (proposing 51st-statehood for Sicily). He is understood to be the inspiration for The Godfather.

Salvatore’s downfall happened in 1947, when he and his gang accidentally shot 17 innocents. This happened to turn public perception against him, and three years later a 2,000-man police force finally snagged the outlaw, who had been betrayed by his trusted confidante, Gaspare Pisciotta. A seemingly sad end for the 27 year old — though some maintain to this day that he faked his own death and survived.[v]

John Murrell

John Murrel

John Murrell. Credit: Wikimedia commons.

If all of our forested bandits were to be split among The Good, The Bad and The Ugly, John Murrell would be alone in the last category. There is very little of the spirit of Robin Hood about this man, if everything he is purported to have done actually happened. There are many conflicting narratives of truth that wrap around this figure. Robert E. Howard wrote about Murrell that:

“John A. Murrell was a hellbender, in Southwest vernacular. He planned no less than an outlaw empire on the Mississippi river, with New Orleans as his capital and himself as emperor. Son of a tavern woman and an aristocratic gentleman, he seemed to have inherited the instincts of both, together with a warped mind that made him as ruthless and dangerous as a striking rattler … surely in that man slept the seeds of greatness, overshadowed by the black petals of madness.”

At the same time, he was an outlaw, squirreling away in an authenticated forest hideout and bossing around a gang of followers with a silly name, so we wouldn’t be doing it justice if we neglected to mention John Murrell.

The boy that would become John Murrell was born in 1806, near Lunenburg County, Va. Then, he moved to Tennessee. His preacher father would travel frequently, and his mother would use her uncouth charms to distract male guests at their B’n’B while her sons rifled through their belongings. John would grow up to combine his parents’ professions, traveling as a pseudo-preacher who would entertain townspeople while his gang stole their horses. Shortly thereafter, he was known as the “Reverend Devil,” as well as the “Great Western Land Pirate.”

Murrell would soon outgrow horse-thieving, however. He moved on to slave-stealing, promising the slave his freedom if John could sell him and free him a few times along the way. If the slave survived all the way to freedom, we wouldn’t consider Murrell such a villain, but he is justly known for leaving no witnesses. Murrell organized a gang, one that Mark Twain claimed to be 1,000-men strong, and named them the “Mystic Clan.” They constructed numerous hideouts throughout the forested Natchez Trace, carving secret symbols on trees to mark the location of their treasures.

Murrell’s coup de grace was supposed to be a mass slave uprising all throughout the South, during the chaos of which he and the Mystic Clan would loot all that was worth looting, before installing him as despot of New Orleans. He was found out and sentenced to 10 years of hard labor, during which he contracted a bunch of diseases and lost the last fragments of his sanity. He would die of tuberculosis shortly after being released. Murrell’s grave would be robbed, and his body dismembered, with his thumb to this day still being a centerpiece for the Tennessee State Museum.

It’s worth noting that many people believe that almost none of this is true — that Murrell was at most an average horse-thief, who had tall tales written about him by Virgil Stewart, a man who placed himself at the forefront of the effort to bust this “legendary” outlaw in a spectacularly self-congratulatory publication. The title of this story is in itself 78-words long. Despite the likely fictitiousness of the publication, it was taken seriously in many towns across the South, and 35 men were hung for supposedly being involved with the Mystic Clan, in what is known as the “Murrell Excitement.”

[i] BBC

[ii] Brandt Travel Guides — Slovakia

[iii] Stowarzyszenie Nauczycieli Internautow

[iv] Wikipedia

[v] Telegraph

The post The Robin Hoods of Other Forests appeared first on American Forests.

Old Photos Reveal New Changes

March 7th, 2017|Tags: |0 Comments

.fusion-fullwidth-1 {
padding-left: px !important;
padding-right: px !important;
}

By Lindsay Seventko, American Forests

Sometimes, it’s hard to appreciate where you are without recognizing where you’ve come from. Through these historic photos from the American Forests archives, we can see just how dramatically climate change has altered landscapes, how new knowledge has evolved wildfire policies and how carbon dating technology has changed our understanding of age-old trees. From when ancient giants were being felled like an assembly line to the evolution of the Smokey Bear wildfire awareness movement, American Forests has been advocating for the protection and restoration of forests through it all. Here are a few memories from the archives that illustrate just how dramatically our landscapes are changing and how far forest conservation has come.

Athabasca Glacier

Athabaska-Glacier

“Tongue of Athabaska Glacier. Sunwapta Canyon in middle distance, headwater of Sunwapta river-route of highway along right of photograph and through canyon, looking north. Jasper National Park, Alberta, Canada. We can actually get out and walk on the ice of the glacier – grim, beautiful, awe inspiring in its slow, cruel strength. July 1941”

These photos of Athabasca Glacier vividly illustrate the effects of climate change on glaciers in North America. Athabasca Glacier has lost two kilometers of its length since 1840, and 200 meters have receded since 1992 alone, threatening to disappear completely within a generation. These photos from the American Forests archives illustrate how deeply the glacier filled the valley between the mountains and extended much further down towards the road. The grim trek across the expansive glacier described by American Forests’ explorers is even more dangerous now. As the glacier quickly melts, it creates even more treacherous chasms and crevasses.

The dramatic shrinking and receding of Athabasca Glacier is by no means unique. In fact, the IPCC believes that melting glaciers will account for a quarter of all sea level rise over the rest of the century.

Athabasca Glacier Now

Credit: Adam Foster via Flickr.

The Grizzly Giant

Grizzly Giant

“Believed to be the oldest living thing – the Grizzly Giant in Mariposa Grove. Nearly 100 feet in circumference and 30 feet in diameter. It has a lean greater than that of the Tower of Pisa. Photo by Ansel Adams. 1941”

Back when the American Forests Champion Tree National Register was just getting started, this Grizzly Giant was not only crowned the Sequoia champion, but also believed to be the oldest living thing on earth, growing since around 200 C.E. This belief has since been overruled by new carbon-14 dating found that a Swedish spruce tree known as “Old Tjikko” has been growing for the past 9,500 years. Despite being overthrown for the title of oldest living tree, The Grizzly Giant has not yet been overthrown as the Champion Sequoia or as the overall largest tree in the register.

Oldest Swedish tree

Oldest Swedish tree. Credit: Karl Brodowsky via wikimedia commons.

 

Smokey the Bear

Smokey-the-Bear-ad

The editor of American Forests in 1957 received this and several other advertisements from the Smokey the Bear campaign, accompanied by a letter requesting that the editor run Smokey the Bear ads because “a shortage of timber threatens your newsprint supply, or causes another dangerous rise in the cost of newsprint.”

Smokey the Bear has remained an Americana icon throughout most of the past century, but he has also changed over the decades to reflect new knowledge and policies on fire management. Now, the campaign features educational fact sheets and handouts about how wildfires can be beneficial within forests and ways to manage the blaze besides direct suppression.

Smokey the bear

Letter received by Smokey the Bear campaign.

The post Old Photos Reveal New Changes appeared first on American Forests.

Urban Forest Programs Manager

.fusion-fullwidth-1 {
padding-left: px !important;
padding-right: px !important;
}

Department

Conservation Programs

Reports to

Director of Urban Forest Programs

Supervises

N/A

Salary

$35,000-$42,000, commensurate with experience.

FLSA Status

Non-exempt

Summary

Manage and implement American Forests’ urban forest projects in several metropolitan areas of the U.S. The portfolio of work includes implementation of American Forests’ Community ReLeaf projects nationwide; national research and synthesis on urban forestry topics; urban forest policy development; and other duties as assigned.

Requisite Education Or Certifications

Minimum of a bachelor’s degree or equivalent professional experience in natural resource management, forestry, urban forestry, environmental science, landscape architecture, environmental engineering, city planning or another related field. Arborist certification is a plus.

Required Experience

Minimum 2 years of work experience in natural resources conservation. The ideal candidate is a self-motivated, interdisciplinary thinker with a passion for and working knowledge of urban sustainability. The candidate should have project management and topical research experience, verbal and written communication skills, be detail oriented, proficient in Microsoft Office and have experience or a demonstrated capacity for organizing volunteer events.

Experience with any of the following will be considered favorably: conservation planning, innovative conservation financing, GIS analysis, i-Tree, implementing urban greening projects, administering grants or contracts, conducting scientific research, engaging volunteers and developing multi-media products, and policy work relevant to greening urban environments.

A combination of education and experience will be considered in determining relative candidate qualifications.

Working Conditions

Some travel will be required outside of the Washington, D.C. area. Most work will be in a general office environment, with some local meetings outside of the office. American Forests is located in downtown Washington, D.C., within walking distance of Metro stations on all lines, multiple bus lines, and Capital Bikeshare.

Specific Duties

Working under the supervision of the Director of Urban Forest Programs, the individual will:

  • Manage day-to-day implementation of American Forests’ Community ReLeaf program. Community ReLeaf is an adaptable initiative to help build local capacity for tree canopy management in select metro areas throughout the country. Project management, including grants and contracts, will be required. Deliverables can include urban tree canopy assessments, green space restoration projects, volunteer events, long-term canopy action plans and policy initiatives.
  • Collect and synthesize content for communication products focused on urban forestry research findings, case studies of diverse cities, in-depth topical investigations, federal programs and engaging diverse disciplines impacted by the urban forest.
  • Provide support for the development and implementation of urban forestry policy initiatives, both in key metropolitan areas and nationally.
  • Manage aspects of the National Champion Tree Program, which includes management of a centralized registry and annual nomination process.
  • Complete other duties as assigned, including periodic support for development and communication efforts and new initiatives as they emerge.

To Apply

To apply, send a cover letter and resume to Ian Leahy, Director of Urban Forest Programs, at jobs@americanforests.org.

The post Urban Forest Programs Manager appeared first on American Forests.

Action Alert: Modernizing the Endangered Species Act

.fusion-fullwidth-2 {
padding-left: px !important;
padding-right: px !important;
}

**If you are having difficulty with accessing the letter, try temporarily disabling your ad/pop-up blocker plugin. Follow these instructions per your default browser.

jQuery(function() {
var myEventMethod =
window.addEventListener ? “addEventListener” : “attachEvent”;
var myEventListener = window[myEventMethod];
var myEventMessage =
myEventMethod == “attachEvent” ? “onmessage” : “message”;
myEventListener(myEventMessage, function (e) {
if (e.data === parseInt(e.data))
jQuery(‘#frame_id’).height(e.data);
}, false);
});

The post Action Alert: Modernizing the Endangered Species Act appeared first on American Forests.

Forest Digest — Week of February 27th, 2017

March 3rd, 2017|Tags: |0 Comments

.fusion-fullwidth-1 {
padding-left: px !important;
padding-right: px !important;
}

Find out the latest in forest news in this week’s Forest Digest!

path in nature

Credit: Develon Ackler via Flickr.

  • What We Can Learn from TreesNational Geographic
    Every tree tells a story. They inspire us, comfort us and remind us how life moves on. Read about the rich histories and profound impacts of unique trees all around the globe.
  • Get Out of Here: Scientists Examine the Benefits of Forests, Birdsong and Running WaterThe New York Times
    Read this review of Florence Williams’ latest release, “The Nature Fix: Why Nature Makes Us Happier, Healthier, and More Creative,” where she argues that we suffer from an “epidemic dislocation from the outdoors.” Learn how spending time in nature can positively impact both our mental and physical health.
  • Study finds secret to diverse forests’ super success — Phys.org
    New research shows why diverse forests are successful. Thanks to their natural varying growth forms and ability to modify their shape to fit the available space, multiple species are able to fill in vertical gaps with branches and leaves. This maximizes their combined ability to soak up the sun falling on a particular plot of land and turn it into tree-absorbing, planet-warming carbon dioxide and producing wood in the process.
  • Complete Guide to YosemiteLiveoncelivewild.com
    The incredibly varied landscape of Yosemite National Park offers plenty of gorgeous views and exciting recreational activities for all of its visitors to enjoy! Discover the well-loved national park in this complete guide to Yosemite and learn what it has to offer.

The post Forest Digest — Week of February 27th, 2017 appeared first on American Forests.